Threatened Waterway Campaigns
SUPPORT TO SAVE THE PEEL WATERSHED - YUKON'S WIND AND SNAKE RIVERS.
These rivers create part of the Peel River watershed. Under the Final Agreement of the First nations Land Claims, the First Nations and Yukon Government are committed to agreeing on a land use plan. A Planning Commission was formed and they have recommended 80% protection of the watershed. Affected First Nations, while supportive of the Commission’s work, are calling for protection of the entire Peel Watershed. Other groups are lobbying the government for no protection.
Watch this video that shows the magnificent features of the watershed and hear the opinions of the First Nations leaders.
Oct 1st is the deadline to tell decision makers that you feel the Planning Commission did a thorough job and whether you feel that the Commission went far enough in recommending 80% protection or whether you support the First Nations’ goal of 100% protection for the Peel watershed.
VIEW PADDLE CANADA'S LETTER OF SUPPORT
HERE.
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION ACT (NWPA)
The Navigable Waters Protection Act (NWPA) was one of the oldest pieces of legislation in Canada. It ensured that, before anyone built something on, in, through, or around the water, they must first have considered the impacts on the environment and navigation, consulted with the people who would be affected, and obtained a permit under the Act from the Minister of Transportation.
The Act has now changed...
07-May-2009:
Paddle Canada presents to the Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources
After being rescheduled, on Thursday, May 7, 2009, Paddle President Richard Alexander finally appeared before the Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources to address our members' concerns regarding the changes to the NWPA as passed in the Budget Implementation Act.
Speaking on behalf of all members of Paddle Canada - individual, instructor and regional members - Mr. Alexander acknowledged that its members and paddlers do recognize the need for legislative change as required to help facilitate economic growth.

As directed by our members, Paddle Canada continued our focus on the lack of transparency during the consultation process as well as the lack of clear, concise and definable definitions and standards that will impact the rights of paddlers in this country. As stated by Mr. Alexander, "...how consultation is carried out can either alleviate or generate fears. From my constituency I think it is safe to say that it generated a lot of fear."
To further qualify, Mr Alexander noted the most specific concern address by our members. "...our membership has concern with the following: The amendments place broad authority in the minister or cabinet to exclude certain classes of works and certain classes of navigable waterways from the approval process without subjecting such exclusion decisions to any objective criteria or public notification and consultation. It is the lack of any criteria on this exemption power that has our members most concerned. We submit that, at a minimum, criteria should exist for classes of navigable waterways."
Mr Alexander further reiterated Paddle Canada's position by advising the Senate Committee that in an "open, transparent discussion about such definition, I have complete faith that we would be able to come to some common ground on the definition with my organization." For our efforts, Paddle Canada was invited to keep in touch with the Standing Senate Committee as they continue their hearings and review of the evidence in this matter.
|
|
|
07-May-2009
|
|
30-Apr-2009
Appointment with Senate Committee rescheduled to 07-May-2009 |
|
28-April-2009
|
|
17-March-2009
Paddle Canada invited to present to Canadian Senators |
|
14-March-2009
|
|
14-August-2008
|
| 09-Jun-2008
|
|
03-Jun-2008
Senate Hearings held |
|
29-May-2008
Senate Hearings held |
|
27-May-2008
|